Is The World Ready To Protect Our Ocean?
For the ocean to recover from more than 50 years of worldwide daily abuse from overfishing and pollution from a million sources, stronger measures need to be taken on a global scale and enforced on a global level. MarineBio poses the question: What if the following policies were put into place?
Global Sustainable Fishing Plan
All fisheries to begin fishing sustainably starting immediately. All companies worldwide must get approval of submitted sustainable fishing plans no later than 30 days before the start of the next fishing year from the Global Ocean Commission—a new top-level group to be created, similar to or a combination of:
- United Nations Division for Sustainable Development,
- The Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea,
- Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO, and
- The Global Programme of Action Clearing-House Mechanism, GPA, UNEP, Protecting the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities, etc.
with world-elected officials and world-wide enforcement power.
Any company found operating without an approved sustainable fishing plan will be fined $1 million per active ship which will then be confiscated and sold at auction with proceeds going to the UN Ocean Commission.
Needed:
1. worldwide acceptance of the idea
2. worldwide compliance with the idea
3. creation of the UN Ocean Commission and staffing with experts capable of producing the above said documents, worldwide offices and teams equipped to monitor fishing efforts, check plan compliance on a ship by ship basis, conduct and gather the research necessary to define what sustainable fishing really is, enforce fines/seizures and collect them, etc.
Fishing companies in compliance would benefit in the following ways:
1. they would be helping to secure their own future
2. they could market themselves as pro-ocean/marine life providing safe, healthy seafood to humans
3. they would not have to pay fines or lose ships
UN Acceptable Pollution Plan
Effective immediately, every coastal state or country must monitor and correct pollutants found in all effluents from their territory to the ocean (including their offshore sources - ocean dumping, oil rigs and ships, etc.) which exceed levels stated in the UN Ocean Commission's Acceptable Pollution Plan. The acceptable levels are to be determined by two factors,
1. the gross amount of effluent reaching the ocean and
2. the ocean area effected in relation to total coastal percentage.
> Click here to download (example only) < the Acceptable Pollution Plan documents which detail acceptable levels for point source sampling, solutions for identifying sources of and correcting excessive pollutants identified, calculations for gross effluents, total state or country pollution levels calculation, state or country acceptable pollution levels, sampling methods and frequencies, and Acceptable Pollution Plan results document for submittal.
Annual submittal is due 30 days before January 1st of each year. Each state or country not submitting a plan or found not to be in compliance with the UN Ocean Commission's Acceptable Pollution Plan will be fined $1 million per day until the plan is received. All states or countries found exceeding the levels outlined in the Acceptable Pollution Plan after the first 2 years, will be fined $1 million per ppm (parts per million = mg/l or mg/kg) of each pollutant over the defined maximum levels. All proceeds will go toward the UN Ocean Commission's Acceptable Pollution Plan program.
Needed:
1. worldwide acceptance of the idea
2. worldwide compliance with the idea
3. a UN Ocean Commission as above with similar goals outline by the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy's Final Report but with global reach and enforcement power (working with each country's equivalent to the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy). Staffed with experts capable of producing the above said documents, worldwide offices and teams equipped to supervise pollution monitoring efforts, check plan compliance on a country by country basis, conduct and gather the research necessary to define what acceptable pollution levels are from a global and ecosystem perspective, enforce fines and collect them, etc. Fisheries monitoring and pollution monitoring teams could even work together.
Countries in compliance would benefit in the following ways:
1. they would be helping to secure their own future
2. they would save money by avoiding fines
3. they could market themselves as pro-earth
4. their citizens would be healthier and therefore happier leading to increased productivity, etc.
What do you think? Sure it's idealistic and simplistic but if it were possible it would greatly improve things for our species as well as others. That's about what it would take to fix what we've done and to protect what we have left for our future in our opinion. And the U.S. would have to start it before the rest of the world will follow because we are the global economic leader and the very top polluter. The time for the world to be ready is now, the supporting evidence is overwhelming.
Feedback?
Something missing or incorrect in the above? Let us know!
Sea Life News :: ScienceDailyAncient seagrass holds secrets of the oldest living organism on Earth
It's big, it's old and it lives under the sea -- and now an international research collaboration has confirmed that an ancient seagrass holds the secrets of the oldest living organism on Earth. Ancient giant Posidonia oceanica reproduces asexually, generating clones of itself. A single organism -- which has been found to span up to 15 kilometers in width and reach more than 6,000 metric tonnes in mass -- may well be more than 100,000 years old.
2011 shark attacks remain steady, deaths highest since 1993
Shark attacks in the US declined in 2011, but worldwide fatalities reached a two-decade high, according to the a new report.
Satellite tracking reveals sea turtle feeding hotspots
Satellite tracking of threatened loggerhead sea turtles has revealed two previously unknown feeding "hotspots" in the Gulf of Mexico that are providing important habitat for at least three separate populations of the turtles.
Global extinction: Gradual doom is just as bad as abrupt
Around 250 million years ago, most life on Earth was wiped out in an extinction known as the "Great Dying." Geologists have learned that the end came slowly from thousands of centuries of volcanic activity.
Scientists coax shy microorganisms to stand out in a crowd
Scientists have advanced a method that allowed them to single out a marine microorganism and map its genome even though the organism made up less than 10 percent of a water sample teeming with many millions of individuals from dozens of identifiable groups of microbes.
Heat and cold damage corals in their own ways
Around the world coral reefs are facing threats brought by climate change and dramatic shifts in sea temperatures. While warming has been the primary focus for scientists and ocean policy managers, cold can also cause significant damage. Scientists have shown that cool temperatures can inflict more damage in the short term, but heat is more destructive in the long run.
Are nuisance jellyfish really taking over the world's oceans?
Evidence is lacking that populations of jellyfish and similar gelatinous plankton are surging in numbers globally and will likely dominate the seas in coming decades. Rather, increasing scientific and media interest as well as the lack of good baseline data seem to explain the widespread perception of an increase.
Global experts question claims about jellyfish populations
Blooms, or proliferation, of jellyfish have shown a substantial, visible impact on coastal populations -- clogged nets for fishermen, stinging waters for tourists, even choked intake lines for power plants -- and recent media reports have created a perception that the world's oceans are experiencing increases in jellyfish due to human activities such as global warming and overharvesting of fish. Now, a new study questions claims that jellyfish are increasing worldwide and suggests claims are not supported with any hard evidence or scientific analyses to date.
Are jellyfish increasing in world's oceans?
A global study has questioned claims that jellyfish are increasing worldwide. Blooms, or proliferation, of jellyfish have shown a substantial, visible impact on coastal populations -- clogged nets for fishermen, stinging waters for tourists, even choked intake lines for power plants -- and recent media reports have created a perception that the world's oceans are experiencing increases in jellyfish due to human activities such as global warming and overharvesting of fish. Now, a new global and collaborative study questions claims that jellyfish are increasing worldwide and suggests claims are not supported with any hard evidence or scientific analyses to date.
Southern Indian ocean humpback whales found singing different tunes
Humpback whales on both sides of the southern Indian Ocean are singing different tunes, unusual since humpbacks in the same ocean basin usually all sing very similar songs.
Mammals shrink at faster rates than they grow: Research helps explain large-scale size changes and recovery from mass extinctions
It took about 10 million generations for terrestrial mammals to hit their maximum mass: that's about the size of a cat evolving into the size of an elephant. Sea mammals, such as whales took about half the number of generations to hit their maximum.
What do killer whales eat in the Arctic?
Killer whales are the top marine predator. The increase in hunting territories available to killer whales in the Arctic due to climate change and melting sea ice could seriously affect the marine ecosystem balance. New research has combined scientific observations with Canadian Inuit traditional knowledge to determine killer whale behavior and diet in the Arctic.
Detecting detrimental change in coral reefs
Over dinner on R.V. Calypso while anchored on the lee side of Glover's Reef in Belize, Jacques Cousteau told Phil Dustan that he suspected humans were having a negative impact on coral reefs. Dustan -- a young ocean ecologist who had worked in the lush coral reefs of the Caribbean and Sinai Peninsula -- found this difficult to believe. It was December 1974. But Cousteau was right. During the following three-plus decades, Dustan, an ocean ecologist and biology professor at the University of Charleston in South Carolina, has witnessed widespread coral reef degradation and bleaching from up close.
Ecologists capture first deep-sea fish noises
Fish biologists conducted one of the first studies of deep-sea fish sounds in more than 50 years, 2,237 feet under the Atlantic. With recording technology more affordable, fish sounds can be studied to test the idea that fish communicate with sound, especially those in the dark of the deep ocean.
Life beyond Earth? Underwater caves in Bahamas could give clues
Discoveries made in some underwater caves by researchers in the Bahamas could provide clues about how ocean life formed on Earth millions of years ago, and perhaps give hints of what types of marine life could be found on distant planets and moons.
Viruses con bacteria into working for them
Researchers have discovered that certain photosynthetic ocean bacteria need to beware of viruses bearing gifts. These viruses are really con artists carrying genetic material taken from their previous bacterial hosts that tricks the new host into using its own machinery to activate the genes, a process never before documented in any virus-bacteria relationship. The con occurs when a grifter virus injects its DNA into a bacterium living in a phosphorus-starved region of the ocean.
Microbubbles provide new boost for biofuel production
A solution to the difficult issue of harvesting algae for use as a biofuel has been developed using microbubble technology.
Attack or retreat? Circuit links hunger and pursuit in sea slug brain
If you were a blind, cannibalistic sea slug, living among others just like you, nearly every encounter with another creature would require a simple cost/benefit calculation: Should I eat that -- or flee? In a new study, researchers report that these responses are linked to a simple circuit in the brain of the sea slug Pleurobranchaea.
Where there's a worm there's a whale: First distribution model of marine parasites provides revealing insights
Each year around 20,000 people are infected by nematodes of the genus Anisakis and suffer from illnesses ranging from gastrointestinal diseases to serious allergic reactions as a result. For the first time, parasitologists have gathered data on the occurrence of the parasitic worm and have modeled the worldwide distribution of individual species in the ocean. The resulting maps not only enable statements to be made on the occurrence and migration behavior of certain hosts of the parasites, such as Baleen or toothed whales, but also provide conclusions on the risk of human infection.
Turtles' mating habits protect against effects of climate change
The mating habits of marine turtles may help to protect them against the effects of climate change. The study shows how the mating patterns of a population of endangered green turtles may be helping them deal with the fact that global warming is leading to a disproportionate number of females being born.
Help us continue to share the wonders of the ocean with the world, raise awareness of marine conservation issues and their solutions, and support marine conservation scientists and students involved in the marine life sciences. Join the MarineBio Conservation Society or make a donation today. We would like to sincerely thank all of our members and donors, we simply could not have achieved what we have without you and we look forward to doing even more.









